http://hphss.blog.tianya.cn/ 只消山水光中，无事过这一夏。 打死wo也不说 2009-11-20星期五(Friday)晴 http://blog.tianya.cn/blogger/post_show.asp?BlogID=49294&PostID=20274658&idWriter=0&Key=0 安兰德 Vs. 奥巴马

作者:曹长青
　

奥巴马成为白宫主人，他的自传，当然就会是畅销书。不仅在美国，即使在中国最大的
网路书店当当网，奥巴马的《无畏的希望》中译本至今还排在“自传类畅销榜 ”。首
位黑人总统的故事，本身就令大众关注，再加上左翼媒体对奥巴马的偏爱和宣传，可想
而知，对其著作的促销作用有多大。

但在今年头七个星期，美国女作家安-兰德（Ayn Rand）的哲理小说《阿特拉斯耸耸肩
》的销量居然超过了奥巴马的自传。而这头七周，正好是奥巴马就职总统，媒体报导和
渲染最热门的期间。兰德并不是当前流行的小说家，她在1982年就过世；她的这本书，
是1957年出版的。一本半世纪前的书，怎么至今还畅销，而且销量还会超过当前名声如
日中天的黑人总统奥巴马的自传？这不是奇迹吗？

对很多中国读者来说，安兰德的名字并不陌生，因为近年中国翻译出版了她的主要作品
（已愈十种），包括两本代表作小说《阿特拉斯耸耸肩》和《源泉》，以及《自私的美
德》、《致新知识份子》等理论专着。看过《阿特拉斯耸耸肩》的读者，可能会明白为
什么美国人现在要看兰德的书，因为这和美国当前的经济危机有关，安兰德的作品描绘
了一个政府在集体主义文化主导下，高举着为社会谋利的道德大旗，对个体创造者施行
各种限制和阻碍，使美国陷入空前危机；而那些创造财富的企业家、思想者，不仅被这
种不公制度敲诈、掠夺，更倍遭道德谴责，于是他们愤然出走“罢工”。使地球转动、
让人类向前迈进的阿特拉斯这位巨人，耸耸肩，不再扛这个地球了。

在奥巴马提出美国有史以来最庞大资金的救市方案、以巨额赤字扩大政府开支（超过美
国建国二百年来历届政府赤字的总和）之后，很多美国人担心美国要走向社会主义，走
向安兰德的书所预测的可怕前景。所以兰德的书，再次成了畅销书。

但兰德的作品在美国并不是因为当前经济危机才被读者关注的。虽然遭到西方左派和基
督教右翼的两面夹击、排斥、痛斥，但她一直有一大批热烈的推崇者。近年她的作品则
以每年五十到八十万的速度在畅销，这在已逝作家中是罕见的。在1998年美国兰登出版
社做的《二十世纪百部最佳英文小说》评选中，在“读者投票评选榜”上，安兰德的《
阿特拉斯耸耸肩》获第一名，《源泉》获第二名。她的另两部小说分别排第七、第八位
。而她一共就出版过四部小说。

在“非虚构类”的读者票选榜上，第一名仍是安兰德的理论专着《自私的美德》。第三
名是兰德的思想继承人佩可夫介绍兰德哲学思想的专集，第六名则是一本关于兰德的评
传。一个作家，能够同时获得虚构、非虚构两个读者评选榜的第一名，并且全部主要作
品都进入前十名，这在美国、在整个英语作品的历史上，都没有过先例！

兰德的作品为什么会有如此这般的影响力？主要是因为她用小说形式传播了一种前所未
有的哲学思想——客观主义。通过她的作品，就她的主要思想，基本可归纳为三个源泉
说∶

第一，一个人理性的自私，也就是在不损害他人前提下的利己，只为自己活着，不仅是
道德的，而且是道德的源泉。自私自利，古往今来，从东方到西方，都被和“ 不道德
”连到一起。但安兰德却颠覆了这个概念，提出利他主义、自我牺牲，甚至为别人活着
，尤其是共产主义那种毫不利己、专门利人的说法，不仅是虚假的，更是不道德的，因
为它为建立集体主义的集权社会提供了底座——只有牺牲个体，才能举起集体的旗帜；
在这个光辉耀眼的旗帜下，就有了践踏一切个人权利的理由。而谁掌握了权力，谁就主
宰了这个集体。“那个向你宣讲牺牲的家伙实际上在讲奴隶和主人，他要当主人。”共
产党总说代表“人民”，西方左派喜欢喊为“公共利益”，就因为这些概念是抽象的，
没有明确的内涵，于是权力者就可以宣布代表人民，代表公共利益，然后以这种名义剥
夺具体的个人权利。一位古罗马皇帝说，希望人类只有一个脖子，这样他就能一刀斩断
。兰德说，“集体主义”就等于把人类变成一个脖子，独裁者就可随意拴上皮带。看看
人类历史，所有的暴政，所有的政治大恐怖，哪个不是在为群体，为人民的利他主义动
机下发生的？所以兰德疾呼，人与人唯一正当、良性的关系，是交换劳动成果，不干涉
他人利益。

为个人的幸福而活着，实际上是人类一直存在的常态，但却被各种利他主义、群体主义
价值所扭曲。安兰德有勇气说出这个真实，更有智慧去论证它的道德性。在西方文明的
进程中，最重要文件之一是美国独立宣言，它主要提出人有三大权利∶生命、自由和追
求幸福的权利。但可能很少有人想到，这三大权利，都是指个人，你自己，而不是某个
群体的权利。美国先贤们早就确立“利己”的个人权利观。美国所以成为全世界最自由
、最富有的国家，如果用两句话概括其原因，就是她确立并实践了两大原则∶限制政府
权力，保护个人权利。兰德提出的“理性的自私，合理的自利”，就是再次确立个人主
义的原则，用它来对抗高举“利他主义”道德大旗、实际残害每一个个体的群体主义。

第二，个人的创造能力和创造性的结果，是幸福的源泉、是价值的源泉。那些主观为个
人幸福而创造着的人们，用他们的劳动成果，在客观上为社会提供了财富。这不仅带来
个人幸福，也是高尚的。而那些好吃懒做者、不用自己的头脑思考（而顺应群体思维）
的思想寄生者，是不道德、不高尚的。而且这种依赖和寄生，为政府主宰一切、走向集
权社会提供了可能。因为“创造者关心的是征服自然，而寄生虫关心的是征服他人”。
思想寄生者要靠人际关系生存，而创造者则孓然独立。安兰德认为，对于一个人来说最
重要的是∶他怎样对待自己；而不是别人认为他怎么样，或他为别人做了什么。他自己
创造的价值，是自己幸福的源泉和尺标，而不是他人的看法和他人的需要。

西方的资本主义和自由市场就为这种个人的创造性劳动（包括思想）提供了最合理、最
公平的交易平台。兰德认为，“如果人们都在公平交易的原则下生活，让理性，而不是
暴力作为裁判，那么最后一定是最好的产品，最佳的表现、最有能力的人胜出。”而用
来做产品交换的金钱，不仅不是“万罪之源”，反而是创造力的象征。英文的挣钱是
make money，直译过来应该是“创造金钱”。兰德说，“这个词包含人类道德的精华”
，因为在真正、正常的资本主义社会，钱所代表的，是创造性劳动，背后的价值是个人
主义和自由。安兰德去世时，包括前美国联储会主席格林斯潘等她的崇拜者，在供人们
参观的她的遗体旁，秽韪F一个巨型的美元$标，象征她所推崇的、建立在公平交易基
础上的资本主义价值，和她为捍卫资本主义所做的贡献。

第三，理性是发现和认识真理的源泉。尊重理性，就是尊重人本身，人是第一位的，人
是根本，而不是任何神秘的虚幻世界。安兰德特别强调以人为本，人的独立思考的价值
。她说，“生命是必须购买的价值，而思考是唯一能买得起它的货币”。安兰德曾这样
总结她的哲学∶“人是一种英雄式的存在；自己的幸福是人生的目的、道德的准则；创
造性的成就是他最高尚的行为；理性是他唯一的绝对标准。”

上述“三源泉”说，是我自己根据兰德的作品、以及她的演讲等，对她的思想和客观主
义哲学所做的一个大致的概括、总结。兰德本人并没有明确地这样用“三个源泉”来阐
述她的哲学思想。我这个概括既不够细致、也不够完整；有兴趣的读者请从兰德原着中
获取其基本思想精神。

兰德的思想对美国人的影响是巨大的。1991年，美国国会图书馆和全美最大图书俱乐部
做了一次读者调查，在被问到“最影响你一生想法”的书时，安兰德的《阿特拉斯耸耸
肩》仅次于《圣经》，排第二位。今天她的书越来越热卖，更反映出美国人在经济危机
之际，对个人自由等价值的思考和重视。



－－原载：《开放》，2009年4月号
http://caochangqing.com/gb/newsdisp.php?News_ID=1883

]]> 2009-11-20 11:42:00(0) 打死wo也不说 2009-11-19星期四(Thursday)晴 http://blog.tianya.cn/blogger/post_show.asp?BlogID=49294&PostID=20249413&idWriter=0&Key=0 from the NewYorkTimes

China Holds Firm on Major Issues in Obama’s Visit
By HELENE COOPER


BEIJING — In six hours of meetings, at two dinners and during a stilted 30-minute news conference in which President Hu Jintao did not allow questions, President Obama was confronted, on his first visit, with a fast-rising China more willing to say no to the United States.

On topics like Iran (Mr. Hu did not publicly discuss the possibility of sanctions), China’s currency (he made no nod toward changing its value) and human rights (a joint statement bluntly acknowledged that the two countries “have differences”), China held firm against most American demands.

With China’s micro-management of Mr. Obama’s appearances in the country, the trip did more to showcase China’s ability to push back against outside pressure than it did to advance the main issues on Mr. Obama’s agenda, analysts said.

“China effectively stage-managed President Obama’s public appearances, got him to make statements endorsing Chinese positions of political importance to them and effectively squelched discussions of contentious issues such as human rights and China’s currency policy,” said Eswar S. Prasad, a China specialist at Cornell University. “In a masterstroke, they shifted the public discussion from the global risks posed by Chinese currency policy to the dangers of loose monetary policy and protectionist tendencies in the U.S.”

White House officials maintained they got what they came for — the beginning of a needed give-and-take with a surging economic giant. With a civilization as ancient as China’s, they argued, it would be counterproductive — and reminiscent of President George W. Bush’s style — for Mr. Obama to confront Beijing with loud chest-beating that might alienate the Chinese. Mr. Obama, the officials insisted, had made his points during private meetings and one-on-one sessions.

“I do not expect, and I can speak authoritatively for the president on this, that we thought the waters would part and everything would change over the course of our almost two-and-a-half-day trip to China,” said Robert Gibbs, the White House spokesman. “We understand there’s a lot of work to do and that we’ll continue to work hard at making more progress.”

Several China experts noted that Mr. Obama was not leaving Beijing empty-handed. The two countries put out a five-point joint statement pledging to work together on a variety of issues. The statement calls for regular exchanges between Mr. Obama and Mr. Hu, and asks that each side pay more attention to the strategic concerns of the other. The statement also pledges that they will work as partners on economic issues, Iran and climate change.

But despite a conciliatory tone that began weeks ago when Mr. Obama declined to meet the Tibetan spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama, before visiting China to avoid offending China’s leaders, it remains unclear whether Mr. Obama made progress on the most pressing policy matters on the American agenda in China or elsewhere in Asia.

The president has had to fend off criticism from American conservatives that he appeared to soften the American stance on the positioning of troops on the Japanese island of Okinawa, and for bowing to Japan’s emperor.

At a regional conference in Singapore, Mr. Obama announced a setback on another top foreign policy priority, climate change, acknowledging that comprehensive agreement to fight global warming was no longer within reach this year.

Past American presidents have usually insisted in advance on some concrete achievements from their trips overseas. President Bush received vigorous endorsements of his top foreign policy priority, the global war on terrorism, during his visits to Beijing, and President Bill Clinton guided China toward joining the World Trade Organization after prolonged negotiations. When either of those presidents visited the country, China often made a modest concession on human rights as well.

This time, Mr. Hu declined to follow the lead of President Dmitri A. Medvedev of Russia, who, after months of massaging by the Obama administration, now says that he is open to tougher sanctions against Iran if negotiations fail to curb Iran’s nuclear program. The administration needs China’s support if tougher sanctions are to be approved by the United Nations Security Council. But during the joint appearance in Beijing on Tuesday, Mr. Hu made no mention of sanctions.

Rather, he said, it was “very important” to “appropriately resolve the Iranian nuclear regime through dialogue and negotiations.” And then, as if to drive home that point, Mr. Hu added, “During the talks, I underlined to President Obama that given our differences in national conditions, it is only normal that our two sides may disagree on some issues.”

White House officials acknowledged that they did not get what they wanted from Mr. Hu on Iran but said that Mr. Obama’s method would yield more in the long term. “We’re not looking for them to lead or change course, we’re looking for them to not be obstructionist,” one administration official said.

In a meeting in Beijing with a senior Chinese official on Wednesday morning, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton again pressed China on Iran. She told the official, Dai Bingguo, that even if China had not decided what sanctions on Iran it would accept, “you need to send a signal,” said a senior American official, who spoke on condition of anonymity so he could describe the exchange.

Mr. Obama did not appear to move the Chinese on currency issues, either. China has come under heavy pressure, not only from the United States but also from Europe and several Asian countries, to revise its policy of keeping its currency, the renminbi, pegged at an artificially low value against the dollar to help promote its exports. Some economists say China must take that step to prevent the return of large trade and financial imbalances that may have contributed to the recent financial crisis.

Mr. Obama on Tuesday could only cite China’s “past statements” in support of shifting toward market-oriented exchange rates, implying that he had not extracted a fresh commitment from Beijing to move in that direction soon.

There are many reasons the White House may have heeded China’s clear desire for a visit free of the polemics that often accompany meetings between leaders of the two countries. Mr. Obama’s foreign policy is rooted in recasting the United States as a thoughtful listener to friends and rivals alike. “No we haven’t made China a democracy in three days — maybe if we pounded our chest a lot that would work,” Mr. Gibbs said in an e-mail message on Tuesday night. “But it hasn’t in the last 16 years.”

Kenneth Lieberthal, a Brookings Institution scholar who oversaw China issues in President Clinton’s White House, agreed. “The United States actually has enormous influence on popular thinking in China, but it is primarily by example,” he said. “If you go to the next step and say, ‘You guys ought to be like us,’ you lose the impact of who you are.”

The National Security Council’s spokesman, Michael A. Hammer, added, “What we did come to do is speak bluntly about the issues which are important to us, not in an unnecessarily offensive manner, but rather in the Obama style of showing respect.”

Mr. Obama, even as he projected a softer image, did nudge the Chinese on some delicate issues.

On Tuesday, standing next to Mr. Hu, Mr. Obama brought up Tibet, where Beijing-backed authorities have clamped down on religious freedom. “While we recognize that Tibet is part of the People’s Republic of China, the United States supports the early resumption of dialogue between the Chinese government and representatives of the Dalai Lama to resolve any concerns and differences that the two sides may have,” he said.

Reporting was contributed by Sharon LaFraniere, Edward Wong, Michael Wines and Mark Landler.

]]> 2009-11-19 14:27:00(-1) 打死wo也不说 2009-11-13星期五(Friday)晴 http://blog.tianya.cn/blogger/post_show.asp?BlogID=49294&PostID=20124724&idWriter=0&Key=0 摘自船尾的blog
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_51d5dcd00100ghpq.html


饮水(2009-11-10 12:00:30)

一个人渴极了。

他一直在寻找水。

他很焦急，因为他好久没饮水了，因为水太难找到了，因为可能会渴死，因为饥渴如火令人欲恼。

穿过了旷野，一片大湖现在眼前。

饥渴的人却一直伫立在水边。

旁人问他为什么不饮水？

他很焦虑。

他说：“这么多的水！可怎么喝得下呐”。

]]> 2009-11-13 14:07:00(0) 打死wo也不说 2009-11-12星期四(Thursday)晴 http://blog.tianya.cn/blogger/post_show.asp?BlogID=49294&PostID=20099133&idWriter=0&Key=0 以下都购自卓越

北京大学外国哲学研究丛书 《海德格尔传》 张祥龙著
商务出版社 2007年4月 定价24元

中国当代学术思想文库 《解释学、海德格尔与儒道今释》 王庆节著
中国人民大学出版社 2004年9月 定价19.80元



《我为什么要写作》 奥威尔著 董乐山译
上海译文出版社 2007年6月 定价18元

精典文库002 《缅甸岁月》 奥威尔著 李锋译
南京大学出版社 2007年8月 定价20元



《从街角数起的第二棵树》 EB怀特著 孙仲旭译
上海译文出版社 定价20元





终于买了阿童木和妹妹的存钱罐，爱不释手，放在工作位上端详。


]]> 2009-11-12 14:33:00(0) 打死wo也不说 2009-11-10星期二(Tuesday)晴 http://blog.tianya.cn/blogger/post_show.asp?BlogID=49294&PostID=20048606&idWriter=0&Key=0 今天补购几本相关的书，购自当当：


北京大学德国研究丛书 《十九世纪德国非主流哲学——现象学史前史札记》
作者：靳希平 吴增定
北京大学出版社2004年8月 定价27元


同文馆·哲学入门丛书 《现象学入门——反思性分析》
[美]莱斯特·恩布里 著；靳希平，水車兀译，靳希平校
北京大学出版社2007年1月 定价20元


哲学的转向：语言与实践译丛 《时间现象学的基本概念》
[德]克劳斯·黑尔德著；靳希平，孙周兴等译，靳希平校




购预防甲流老年药方。
]]> 2009-11-10 15:26:00(0) 打死wo也不说 2009-11-9星期一(Monday)晴 http://blog.tianya.cn/blogger/post_show.asp?BlogID=49294&PostID=20026042&idWriter=0&Key=0 商务1999年曾出版的萨弗兰斯基《海德格尔传》，这次作为《中国现象学文库·现象学原典译丛》的第一种出版，依照原著主题和副题，中文版原来的副题“来自德国的大师”变成主书名；加副题“海德格尔和他的时代”。
《海德格尔与其思想的开端》，作为海德格尔年鉴的第一卷。

今天从商务购得。


回来的路上，在街边小店看到阿童木和他妹妹一对存钱罐，爱不释手。可惜没带现金，只好改日再去。

阿童木寄予太多童年美好回忆，那是家里买了电视后看的第一部动画片。
其实是爸妈看到哥哥和我每天跑去单位看电视太辛苦，千方百计找来一张电视票。
幸运的是，电视买到时，阿童木还没播完呢。]]> 2009-11-9 16:07:00(0) 素心人语 2009-11-6星期五(Friday)晴 http://blog.tianya.cn/blogger/post_show.asp?BlogID=49294&PostID=19950168&idWriter=0&Key=0 不完全的，都是手头有的。

华夏出版社
一个人的颂歌
自私的德性
客观主义伦理学导论
商人为什么需要哲学


新星出版社
理性的声音
致新知识分子
[通往明天的唯一道路]

重庆出版社
源泉
阿特拉斯耸耸肩

有一位出版界前辈一致致力于引介兰德著作，也曾答应他写个专题。
最近机缘巧合，重新拾起这些书。

一言蔽之，读兰德是我们当今社会的“必需”。
我们的社会政治面貌为后共*产*主义—前社*会*主义，经济面貌为托拉斯主义—前资本主义，法制面貌为法律为政党制度让步。

未来一个月，周一至周五都会写点儿兰德。希望积少成多，达成夙愿。]]> 2009-11-9 10:08:00(2) 打死wo也不说 2009-11-5星期四(Thursday)晴 http://blog.tianya.cn/blogger/post_show.asp?BlogID=49294&PostID=19926296&idWriter=0&Key=0 Brutal Terrain
By JAMES M. McPHERSON
Skip to next paragraph
THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR

A Military History

By John Keegan

Illustrated. 396 pp. Alfred A. Knopf. $35
John Keegan is our generation’s foremost military historian. His 1976 book “The Face of Battle” helped start what is still called “the new military history,” with its emphasis on the cultural context of war and the actual experience of men in battle. In more than a dozen additional books, Keegan has demonstrated his narrative and analytical skills in the traditional genre of military history, concentrating on questions of command, strategy, tactics and the changing technologies of warfare. With great expectancy, therefore, one turns to his first book-length study of the Civil War.

In some respects “The American Civil War: A Military History” fulfills such high expectations. With deft turns of phrase, Keegan portrays the weaknesses and strengths of the war’s principal commanders. The Union general George B. McClellan suffered from a “disabling defect as a commander: readiness to take counsel of his fears.” He was “psychologically deterred from pushing action to the point of result. Fearing failure, he did not try to win.”

In contrast, Gen. Ulysses S. Grant, of whom little was expected at the beginning, turned out to be “both an absolutely clear-sighted strategist and a ruthless battle-­winner.” He displayed “all the qualities that Lincoln hoped to find in McClellan but failed to.” Grant had an extraordinary ability “to visualize terrain in his mind’s eye”; he “quickly grasped how modern methods of communication, particularly the telegraph and the railroads, had endowed the commander with the power to collect information more quickly and the means to disseminate appropriate orders in response.”

Robert E. Lee’s “greatest gifts of generalship were quick and correct decision-making in the face of the enemy, exploitation of his enemy’s mistakes and economic handling of the force available to him.” But unlike Grant, “Lee was not really a strategist, though he was a brilliant tactician and operational leader.”

As for other generals, Keegan considers Stonewall Jackson “a military genius” whose operational motto, however — “always mystify, mislead and surprise the enemy” — sometimes mystified his own subordinates. The Confederate general Braxton Bragg, “though a fighter, was also bad-tempered and alienated most of his subordinates by insulting them,” while William T. Sherman “showed something of Grant’s gifts of communication, quickness of decision and ruthless analysis of the military situation.”

In sum, “Sherman and Grant were the two outstanding generals of the war” because they recognized what Keegan calls the “geostrategic problems” facing Union armies and figured out how to overcome them. Geography, Keegan writes, is “the most important of all factors that impinge on war-making,” especially in North America, where “the vast extent of territory and its varied and dramatic character oblige soldiers to conform to its demands more rigorously than in almost any other region of the world.”

The Confederacy comprised 800,000 square miles, an area about the size of Spain, Italy, France, Germany and Poland combined. The Southern coastline against which the Union navy mounted a blockade was 3,500 miles long. The Appalachian mountain chain constituted a military barrier to Union invasion, while many Southern rivers also provided strong defensive positions. These geostrategic obstacles eventually succumbed to the technology of steam power on rivers and rails, the mobility of armies commanded by Grant and Sherman, and the hard fighting that depleted Confederate manpower by battle, capture and attrition.

The analytical value of Keegan’s geostrategic framework is marred by numerous errors that will leave readers confused and misinformed. I note this with regret, for I have learned a great deal from Keegan’s writings. But he is not at top form in this book. Rivers are one of the most important geostrategic features he discusses. “The Ohio and its big tributaries, the Cumberland and the Tennessee,” he writes, “form a line of moats protecting the central Upper South, while the Mississippi, with which they connect, denies the Union any hope of penetration.” The reality was exactly the contrary. These navigable rivers were highways for Union naval and army task forces that pierced the Confederate heartland, capturing Nashville, New Orleans, Memphis and other important cities along with large parts of Tennessee, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Arkansas. Keegan acknowledges this reality later in the book when he notes that these rivers “offered points of penetration to the Union into Confederate territory.” Precisely.

But Keegan’s grasp of river geography and other terrain features is shaky. He confuses the Ohio and Tennessee Rivers, seems to place the Confederate forts Henry and Donelson on the wrong rivers, has the Kanawha River join the Monongahela River at Pittsburgh to form the Ohio River (it is the Allegheny River that joins the Monongahela, while the Kanawha empties into the Ohio 150 miles southwest of Pittsburgh) and shifts the state of Tennessee northward, where he says it “gives on to” Illinois, Indiana and Ohio. The Confederates did not abandon their strong point on Island No. 10 on the Mississippi River; Union forces surrounded and captured it with its 5,000 defenders. Tunnel Hill at Chattanooga is not a feature of Lookout Mountain, and the battle of Cedar Mountain did not take place in the Blue Ridge.

There are many other errors in the text, perhaps foreshadowed by wrong dates for a half-dozen battles on the map at the beginning of the book. North Carolina did not escape Union invasion until almost “the end of the war” (it was first invaded in February 1862); the old canard that some Union soldiers were bayoneted in their blankets at Shiloh is simply not true; at least 10 percent of United States soldiers in 1865 were black, not 3 percent; the British government recognized the Confederacy’s belligerent status under international law in May 1861, not 1863; and so on.

These and similar mistakes can perhaps be attributed to carelessness, but others seem inexplicable. Keegan declares that Lincoln “never learnt the importance of visiting armies in the field, from which he might have discovered a great deal,” apparently unaware that Lincoln visited armies in the field 11 times, spending 42 days in their camps. Describing the role of the United States Navy in the Civil War, Keegan makes the astonishing claim that at the outbreak of the conflict “almost all” of its “antiquated” warships were sailing vessels and that “none had been launched later than 1822.” In fact, 57 of the Navy’s ships had been launched since 1822, and 23 of them were steamships, including six screw frigates launched in the 1850s that were as advanced as any ships of their class in the world. And what is one to make of the statement by Keegan, a native Englishman, that the British prime minister during the American Civil War was Benjamin Disraeli? (It was Viscount Henry Palmerston.)

Keegan’s sympathies lie with the Union cause in the war, and he considers Lincoln a better commander in chief than Jefferson Davis. Like Grant and Sherman, Lincoln “abandoned altogether the conventional thought that the capture of the enemy’s capital would bring victory. Instead he now correctly perceived that it was only the destruction of the South’s main army that would defeat the Confederacy.” But Keegan shares a widespread misconception about Lincoln’s most eloquent expression of the war’s meaning. “The genius” of the Gettysburg Address, he writes, “lies less in his magnificent words than in his refusing to differentiate between the sacrifice of the North and the South.” This assertion could not be more wrong. The soldiers who “gave the last full measure of devotion” at Gettysburg so that the “nation might live” were Union soldiers. No Confederates were buried in the cemetery that Lincoln dedicated; they fought to break up the nation that the “brave men” whom Lincoln honored fought to preserve. Far from refusing to differentiate between the sacrifice of the North and the South, Lincoln made the most profound differentiation.

James M. McPherson’s most recent book is “Abraham Lincoln.”

]]> 2009-11-5 12:56:00(0) 素心人语 2009-11-4星期三(Wednesday)晴 http://blog.tianya.cn/blogger/post_show.asp?BlogID=49294&PostID=19902549&idWriter=0&Key=0 在菜园看到的。跟预想中差不多。

http://bbs.99read.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=18&Id=148175]]> 2009-11-4 14:42:00(0) 素心人语 2009-11-3星期二(Tuesday)晴 http://blog.tianya.cn/blogger/post_show.asp?BlogID=49294&PostID=19875947&idWriter=0&Key=0




疯狂想念潭柘寺雪松。]]> 2009-11-3 13:15:00(0) 素心人语 2009-10-19星期一(Monday)晴 http://blog.tianya.cn/blogger/post_show.asp?BlogID=49294&PostID=19546551&idWriter=0&Key=0 《坐看云起——济群法师访谈录》 戒幢佛学研究所，内刊
法师在“我的出家生活”中提到的三座福建著名丛林，我恰好都有缘见识：福州鼓山涌泉寺、莆田广化寺和厦门南普陀寺；不由忆起在三座寺庙的触动之机，备感亲切。

《源——探索生命的无限》 吴明山于石家庄三字禅茶院述 内刊
真正当得起“清通可读，深入浅出”八字。

　　《一沙一世界》 李喆守著/绘 于萌译
这个韩国男人在画本出版时住在朴达村，“一边从事农耕一边从事版画创作”。
]]> 2009-10-19 14:27:00(0) 打死wo也不说 2009-10-19星期一(Monday)晴 http://blog.tianya.cn/blogger/post_show.asp?BlogID=49294&PostID=19539702&idWriter=0&Key=0 万物并作——冯骥才的文与画

《灵性》是冯骥才近年散文诗的结集，曾发表在冯先生的个人博客中，作者因感叹无暇回复博客读者留言而产生“编印成书之想”。
这部向纪伯伦和泰戈尔致敬的散文诗集，记录了作者对自然和人生的虚心体味。这里不妨摘些句子：
“一滴春雨落入杯中，我端起杯子，细品着春的滋味。
一片秋叶飘入杯中，我不动杯子，凝视着秋的容光。

“湖边长长的草，
是永远不闭合的碧绿的睫毛。

“大地昨夜做了一个奇异的梦，
漫山遍野的白雪都开了花。

“夜里我忘记关窗，
清晨发现许多新生的蔷薇缀满花朵伸进屋来。”

这是对自然万物轮回衰荣的体察，“不动”和“忘记”的澄怀味象，即便“身口意初不喧”，也不会妨碍“自然灵气，恍惚而来”。

“局限不是一个人的底线，而是轮廓线，
看到自己的局限，就看清了自己。

“人生最大的辩证是：
不在于你是否这样做过，而在于你是否这样想过；
不在于你是否这样想过，而在于你是否这样做过。

“人生的悲剧是：
一半得不到自由，一半得到了却不知道做什么。”

对人生本身的观照足以引起读者的共鸣——或许我们都曾在静夜这样反思人生。书中另一处的妙悟“书里夹着许多有生命的人，只要你打开书，他们全都能站起来”更是读书的一个隐秘乐趣。
可惜，我们只能旁观他人的人生，却无法通过任何方式通览自己的一生，我们只能在孤独的生命之河中顺势而下，处变不惊。

“你什么都不做，表针也在走。

“时间对生命用减法，
对生命所创造的却用加法。”
时间是什么？“虽然我们也曾以为自己懂得，但细想起来却感到困惑不安”，柏拉图用这句话来哲学家表示对万物竟然存在的“惊奇”；但用在时间上也是再恰当不过。

“禅，就是活着之时达到死后的境界。

“只有欲望很小的人才有资格谈超然。”
参禅论道，如人饮水，各有体悟。我倒是推崇《五灯会元》中“字即不识，义即请问”和庄子式“目击而道存”的中国式智慧和宽容，“人人皆可成佛”，就为欲海中浮沉的现代人留了熹微的光亮。

值得一提的是，这个集子里选的冯骥才的画（下称“冯画”）充满几组意象：水与波、光与影、林与花。我把它们解读为：思想、时间和生命。
文如其人，画如其人，冯画的意境接近传统写意画：27页的“林间”、67页的“梦”、71页的“黎明诗句”、83页的“雪夜”、91页的“静谧”、95页的“朦胧”及111页的“低烟”。
画境营造出寂寂无人的清澈和宁静，却“其间莫非生意，万物莫不适性”，带一丝生命的欣喜和希望。

若要求全，我认为，富于意境、堪称唯美的冯画有几幅缺乏精炼的名字。比如，第11页的“雄劲”和第103页的“激荡”可以互换，依拙见，互换主题甚至更合适。相似的还有51页的“解冻”和115页的“二月”；43页的“曙色”和99页的“清澈”。
继续美玉求瑕，19页的“思绪如烟”就不如只用“思绪”或“如烟”；35页“阳光顺坡而下”就不如“阳光”来的含蓄，留给读者更多想象的空间。
艺术品欣赏的过程是互动的，因此不惮将个人浅见植入，与诸位读者分享。

此外的一点意见：书中文与图之间的关系也不是太清晰，是互文还是随机摆放？





灵性——冯骥才的文与画
978-7-108-03313-0
三联书店 2009年10月 定价：20元

]]> 2009-10-19 10:09:00(0) 打死wo也不说 2009-10-14星期三(Wednesday)晴 http://blog.tianya.cn/blogger/post_show.asp?BlogID=49294&PostID=19443275&idWriter=0&Key=0 
The Essence of America in 1,095 Pages
By PATRICIA COHEN

With entries on the porn star Linda Lovelace, the indie film “Wild Style” and Hurricane Katrina, it is clear that “A New Literary History of America” is not your typical Harvard University Press anthology. Although it has many features of an academic compendium — page numbers that reach into four digits and scores of scholarly contributors — this new collection of essays, being released on Wednesday, roams far beyond any standard definition of literature. Aside from compositions that contain the written word, its subjects include war memorials, jazz, museums, comic strips, film, radio, musicals, skyscrapers, cybernetics and photography.

“We didn’t want to call it a cultural history because it’s too trendy,” Greil Marcus, an author and one of the volume’s editors, said; that might suggest it was “intellectually soft.”

Soft? Probably not. The academy these days is nothing if not trendy. Idiosyncratic? Most definitely.

At the project’s start four years ago, Lindsay Waters, an editor at Harvard University Press, told the book’s editors, “This is not an encyclopedia, but a provocation,” recalled Werner Sollors, a Harvard professor and the other half of the book’s editing team. “We wanted people to surprise themselves with their essays,” Mr. Sollors said.

So how does one select which moments and artifacts from North America’s last 500 years deserve inclusion? With a meeting. Mr. Sollors and Mr. Marcus gathered a dozen scholars to be the editorial board and the group began brainstorming, ultimately suggesting over 400 topics. Some were obvious: the Declaration of Independence, “Leaves of Grass,” Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address, “The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn,” “The Great Gatsby.”

Others were obscure, unexpected or unlikely: how “canoe” may have become the first American Indian word to enter the European lexicon, the first potato chip, Charles Dickens’s “American Notes,” Levi Strauss’s blue jeans with rivets, Alcoholics Anonymous, the blues singer Mamie Smith, the atomic bomb dropping on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, as well as the very literary history that was the subject of their meeting.

Mr. Marcus then “took on the role of mindless censor,” he said, cutting the number of topics in half. That edited list became the new starting point. “Every time there was a disagreement, we’d stop and discuss it,” Mr. Marcus said. Often the discussion would lead to a wholly new idea.

Gerald L. Early, a professor at Washington University in St. Louis, was the one who suggested Linda Lovelace. “We all said, ‘You’ve got to be kidding,’ ” Mr. Marcus related. “He said, ‘No, I’m not.’ ”

Mr. Early argued that the memoir had been the dominant literary genre during the past 40 years, and that Linda Lovelace’s autobiographies were “the prototype, the most sensational, the hot center of what storytelling in America in the present age is.”

Linda Lovelace stayed. So did A.A., Mamie Smith and the bomb; canoe, potato chips, Dickens, Levi’s and this particular literary history (which Mr. Marcus called the worst idea of all) did not.

Each topic begins with an event, a moment that something changed, an act of creation, the editors said. Chuck Berry was included rather than Elvis Presley, Mr. Marcus said, because Mr. Berry wrote his own songs. A similar analysis favored the country singer Hank Williams.

Choosing writers came next. Editorial board members suggested themselves as well as others. Sometimes a subject and a writer didn’t work out. For an essay combining two 1936 books, Faulkner’s “Absalom, Absalom!” and Margaret Mitchell’s “Gone With the Wind,” Mr. Marcus contacted two Southerners, Lee Smith and Bobbie Ann Mason, only to discover that neither had ever read Mitchell’s thick novel. Then he tried Carolyn Porter, a professor emeritus at the University of California, Berkeley. “Read it?” she replied. “I’ve memorized it.”

The 201 contributors include some well-known writers, scholars and artists, like Gish Jen, Bharati Mukherjee, Walter Mosley, Michael Tolkin, Helen Vendler, Camille Paglia, Richard Powers, Ishmael Reed, Ted Gioia, Sarah Vowell, Cass Sunstein, Richard Schickel and Michael Kazin.

The collection is arranged chronologically, but, Mr. Sollors said, publication dates were often ignored in favor of the date of an initial inspiration or a literary ancestor. An essay on Longfellow’s “Song of Hiawatha,” for example, begins in 1822 with Ojibwe children in Michigan Territory chanting a nursery rhyme about a firefly in their native tongue — phrases that make their way into Longfellow’s 1855 poem: “Wah-wah-taysee, little firefly/ Little flitting, white-fire insect.”

Mr. Marcus said the editors took pains to exclude ideologues on the right and the left, although a liberal perspective can be detected in several essays, including one about Ronald Reagan’s speech “A Time for Choosing” on behalf of Barry Goldwater.

Although a handful of negative references to George W. Bush remain, including one in Mr. Sollors and Mr. Marcus’s joint essay on New Orleans and Hurricane Katrina, Mr. Marcus said he deleted others that were not an integral part of an argument.

The final contribution in the book is dated “2008, November 4”; its subject is Barack Obama.

President Obama’s election came near the tail end of the process. The editors wanted to note it, but felt, as Mr. Sollors said, that “absolutely the wrong way to do this was some essay on what it all means.”

They “thought and thought,” Mr. Marcus continued, and contacted Kara Walker, an artist and a recipient of a so-called genius grant from the MacArthur Foundation. “We didn’t know what she would make,” he said.

She created not an essay but a series of nine collages that feature her characteristic hand-cut black-paper silhouettes. Four of them feature a scrawl of text, one has a few sentences from President Obama’s autobiography “Dreams From My Father” pasted around the edges, and the rest, which make up the coda to this new literary history, have no words at all.


]]> 2009-10-14 11:17:00(0) 素心人语 2009-10-10星期六(Saturday)晴 http://blog.tianya.cn/blogger/post_show.asp?BlogID=49294&PostID=19382401&idWriter=0&Key=0 让孩子拥有更加明净的天空——第十一批认捐活动结束致网友


阳春三月，和风劲吹，杨花飞飏。在春天这个播种希望的季节里，希望之光又开始了新一批的认捐活动。

这是希望之光的第十一批认捐活动，于2003年4月19日20时开始。这次活动得到了网友一如既往的支持，现场跟贴认捐过程仅仅用了不到一个小时的时间，已经于19日21时结束。认捐居然可以被有些网友形容为紧张刺激，可见，认捐的热烈踊跃。无声的行动胜过任何美丽的言辞，正是网友们的行动，让我们看到希望常在人间。

一方面捐助人的热情使人感到暖意融融，让这个春天也变得更加动人；然而，另一方面，我们也感到我们还有许多工作要做，以便让更多的孩子受益，重圆返校的梦想，让更多的捐助人如愿以偿。

这次认捐活动中，有许多朋友提出，我们的认捐方式中有不合理之处，我们已经接受了大家意见，现在的认捐方式也是一种探索，我们会不断努力，寻求更合理、有效的方法，欢迎您提出您认为最好的办法。

希望之光的第十一次认捐活动虽告一段落，如同往常一样，我们深切地感受到，我们的任务却远未结束。认捐活动的完成，意味着有一批孩子需要我们继续关注和跟踪调查，我们将继续与孩子和捐助人保持联系，竭尽所能核查善款的去向。让我们共同努力，浇灌撒播下的希望的种子，陪伴它们生根发芽，茁壮成长。

衷心感谢每一位参加认捐的网友，正是你们的真诚、热心和信任，点燃了孩子们求学生涯的希望之光，鞭策我们不断努力，继续前行。让我们继续共同努力，履行行胜于言的承诺，在为孩子提供必要的经济资助的同时，传播人文理念，使得他们童年的天空更加明净美丽，多谢阳光，少些阴霾。

再次感谢大家！


希望之光
2003.4.19
]]> 2009-10-10 15:24:00(7) 素心人语 2009-10-10星期六(Saturday)晴 http://blog.tianya.cn/blogger/post_show.asp?BlogID=49294&PostID=19378511&idWriter=0&Key=0 昨天与小同事聊天，说起鬼故事。勾起我叙述的欲望。
]]> 2009-10-10 10:52:00(0) 素心人语 2009-9-27星期日(Sunday)晴 http://blog.tianya.cn/blogger/post_show.asp?BlogID=49294&PostID=19207812&idWriter=0&Key=0 这是朱天文的句子（大意）。记得引了MJ的句子，生来是为了长生不死。
没人能长生不死，厌倦生的热闹归于死的禅寂却不是长者的想法。


《荒人手记》与《喜宴》、《面子》对着看，看出两代人的悲欢。

“阿尧待人热络多情，而把所有的乱暴都发在他母亲身上。我始终厌恶他用坦白不
遮蔽的态度对他母亲，堂皇将情人带回家，我说阿尧，房子不是你的耶。我们屡次
为了这种事斗气，我怪他侵犯别人的感觉，加诸他母亲，则根本是拿著利器在不断
戳戮一只没有防卫能力的无壳蜗牛。我说阿尧，我们的世界，狂野又荒凉，妈妈她
一辈子不会理解的。不是不愿意，是不能。不能的，一般人都不能，他们秩序的宇
宙是也很脆弱的啊。 ”

我们没有这么极端的境遇，却也无数次有意无意打破他们的秩序，侵犯他们的感受。]]> 2009-9-27 13:38:00(0) 素心人语 2009-9-22星期二(Tuesday)晴 http://blog.tianya.cn/blogger/post_show.asp?BlogID=49294&PostID=19130885&idWriter=0&Key=0 9•26古希腊哲学青年论坛第一次活动通知暨议程
各位专家学者：
兹定于9月26日9点在北京大学哲学系会议室（静园四号院）举行古希腊哲学青年论坛第一次活动，欢迎您届时参加。
本次论坛活动为期一天，分上午、下午两场，共讨论两篇专业论文。一篇是北京大学哲学系吴天岳老师所写的“重思《理想国》中的城邦-灵魂类比”，另一篇是中国人民大学哲学院聂敏里老师所写的“《物理学》第一卷中亚里士多德对巴门尼德存在论的批判”。每篇论文各有两位评论人。吴天岳的论文评议人是吴增定和先刚，聂敏里的论文评议人是李猛和詹文杰。
下面是本次论坛活动的具体议程：

上午：9:00-11:30，主持人：吴飞
1．《世界哲学》主编李河研究员致辞（9:00-9:10）
2．“重思《理想国》中的城邦-灵魂类比”论文研讨（9:10-11:30）
（1）论文主题人发言
吴天岳（9:10-9:50）
（2）论文评论人发言：
吴增定（9:50-10:10）
先 刚（10:10-10:30）
（3）自由评论（10:30-11:30）

午餐和休息时间（12:00-1:30）

下午：2:00-4:30，主持人：成官泯
1．“《物理学》第一卷中亚里士多德对巴门尼德存在论的批判”论文研讨（2:00-4:30）
（1）论文主题人发言
聂敏里（2:00-2:40）
（2）论文评论人发言：
李 猛（2:40-3:00）
詹文杰（3:00-3:20）
（3）自由评论（3:20-4:30）



古希腊哲学青年论坛

]]> 2009-9-22 22:19:00(1) 素心人语 2009-9-21星期一(Monday)晴 http://blog.tianya.cn/blogger/post_show.asp?BlogID=49294&PostID=19108362&idWriter=0&Key=0 来源：豆瓣三联文生小组


2007-05-27 17:43:32 来自: LiMeng
1. 《一间自己的屋子》 伍尔夫
2. 《人生五大问题》 安德烈 . 莫罗阿
3. 《人类的群星闪耀时》 斯蒂芬 . 茨威格
4. 《上帝的一生》 佛朗哥.费鲁奇
5. 《六说文学批评》 蒂博代
6. 《幽黯国度︰记忆与现实交错的印度之旅》
作者：奈保尔 译者：李永平 2003年8月第1版
7. 《印度︰受伤的文明》
作者：(英国)V.S.奈保尔 出版日期：2003-8
8. 《印度︰百万叛变的今天》 V.S.奈保尔
9. 《文艺复兴时期的人》 欧金尼奥•加林
10. 《古希腊的神话与宗教》让——皮埃尔•韦尔南
11. 《圣经：一部历史》维尔纳•克勒尔
12. 《伊利亚随笔选》查尔斯•兰姆
13. 《伊丽莎白女王和埃塞克斯伯爵——一段悲剧性的历史》斯特莱切
14. 《两种文化》C•P•期诺
15. 《吉本自传》 爱德华•吉本
16. 《有关神的存在和性质的对话》 尼古拉•马勒伯朗士等
17. 《沉默之子——论当代小说》 迈克尔.伍德
18. 《幸运生涯》 费希
19. 《彼得•潘》 巴里
20. 《法国掠影》 詹姆斯
21. 《英国风情》 詹姆斯
22. 《教育的目的》 怀特
23. 《莱奥纳多•达•芬奇笔记》 埃玛•阿•斯特
24. 《意志自由》 洛斯基
25. 《葛莱齐拉》 拉马丁
26. 《墓中回忆录》 夏多布里昂
27. 《论戏剧》 卢梭
28. 《卢梭的生平和著作》 罗曼•罗兰
29. 《磨坊书简》 都德
30. 《萨福——一个欧美文学传统的生成》 田晓菲
31. 《镜中瑕疵》 [我的自画像] 帕特.克.怀特
32. 《苏曼殊传》 柳无忌
33. 《沙郡年记》 李奥帕德
34. 《醒来的森林》 巴勒斯
35. 《欧洲书简》 勃莱尔
36. 《沙漏》 梅特林克 等
37. 《夏日走过山间》 约翰.缪尔
38. 《神祗.坟墓.学者:欧洲考古人的故事》 德.西拉姆
39. 《弥尔顿传略》 帕蒂森
40. 《米沃什词典》
41. 《哲学与幼童》 加雷斯.皮.马休斯
42. 《笑的历史》 让.诺安
43. 《安德烈•莫洛亚传》 纳尔基里耶尔
44. 《一个政治家的肖像——约瑟夫.富歇传》 茨威格
45. 《沙漠革命记》 劳伦斯
46. 《批评生理学》 阿贝尔.蒂博尔
47. 《昨日的世界》 茨威格
48. 《玛丽•斯图亚特：苏格兰女王的悲剧》
49. 《关于来诺尼亚王国的十三个童话故事》 莱•柯拉柯夫斯基
50. 《历代大师——伯恩哈德作品选》 托马斯•伯恩哈德
51. 《思考与回忆》 俾斯麦
52. 《权力、政治与文化——萨义德访谈录》 薇斯瓦纳珊编
53. 《格格不入——萨义德回忆录》 萨义德
54. 《诠释与过度诠释》 安贝托•艾柯等
55. 《悠游小说林》 安贝托•艾柯
作者：安贝托•艾柯 出版日期：2005-10
56. 《伏尔泰的椰子》 伊恩•布鲁玛
作者：(英)伊恩•布鲁玛 译者：刘雪岚 萧萍 2007年2月第1版
57. 《百变小红帽一则童话三百年的演变》
作者：(美)凯瑟琳•奥兰丝汀 译者：杨淑智 2006年10月第1版
58. 《摩诃婆罗多的故事》
作者：(印度)拉贾戈帕拉查理 改写 译者：唐季雍 2007年3月第1版
59. 《门萨的娼妓——伍迪•艾伦幽默文集》伍迪•艾伦
60. 《我是说谎者》
作者：(意)费里尼 出版日期：2000-10
61. 《小人物日记》格罗史密斯兄弟
作者：乔治•格罗史密斯，威登•格罗史密斯 译者：孙仲旭 2005年3月第1版
62. 《文明与野蛮》
作者：（美）路威 著，吕叔湘 译 出版日期：2005-3-1
63. 《我怎样学习和写作》
作者：高尔基 出版年：1984年6月
64. 《夏洛蒂•勃朗特书信》
作者： 夏洛蒂 出版年： 1986
65. 《情爱论》
作者: (保)瓦西列夫 译者: 赵永穆等 出版年: 1984-10-01
66. 《马雅可夫斯基小传》
67. 《文艺复兴时期的佛罗伦萨》
68. 《列维•施特劳斯》
69. 《海明威谈创作》
70. 《阿瑟•米勒论剧散文》
71. 《艺术与宗教》
72. 《异端的权利》
73. 《番石榴飘香》
74. 《自我论》
75. 《导演们》
76. 《四海之内》
77. 《思想家》
78. 《狱中二十年》
79. 《画布上的泪滴》
80. 《一部小说的故事》
81. 《书和画像》
82. 《女杰书简》
83. 《卢梭的生平和创作》
84. 《发挥你的潜能》
85. 《小说的艺术》
86. 《不是我，而是风》
87. 《六人》
88. 《人生的五大问题》
89. 《富兰克林自传》
90. 《俄罗斯的暗夜》
91. 《耳证人》
92. 《人与事》
93. 《寻找一个角色》
94. 《并非舞文弄墨》
95. 《我与兰登书屋》
96. 《漫话圣经》
97. 《圣经是怎样一部书》
98. 《伦敦的叫卖声》
99. 《关于爱和美的哲学思考》
100. 《英伦独语》（西班牙）桑塔耶纳 著
101. 《宫廷文化》（德）布姆克 著
102. 《浅薄之尤——伍迪•艾伦幽默文集》（美）伍迪•艾伦 著
103. 《俄罗斯文化史》（俄）里亚普采夫 著

六月八日更新

筱雅：

2007年以后的：
(意)达·芬奇 (Da Vinci, Leonardo) 原著 达·芬奇笔记
(法)卢梭 (Rousseau, Jean-Jacques) 著 卢梭论戏剧 （重版）
(英)布衣 (Buruma, Ian) 著 伏尔泰的椰子 : 欧洲的英国文化热
(印)拉贾戈帕拉查理 (Rajagopalachari, C.) 改写 摩诃婆罗多的故事
(波)柯拉柯夫斯基 (Kolakowski,Leszek) 著 关于来洛尼亚王国的十三个童话故事
(德)格特勒 (Goettle, Gabriele) 著 寻访行家
(英)赫丽生 (Harrison, Jane Ellen) 著 古代艺术与仪式
(日)河合隼雄 著 日本人的传说与心灵
(法)萨克斯 (Sachs,Maurice) 著 充满幻觉的轻浮时代: 巴黎日记(1919.7.14-1929.10.30)
(英)特兰 (Teran, Lisa St. Aubin de) 编并序 意大利之魅
(法)波德莱尔 (Baudelaire, Charles) 著 人造天堂

早于1984年的文生译丛
勃赖特尔 W. 著 父亲们 专著 1954
西格斯 A. 著 第一步 专著 1954
西格斯 A. 撰 一个人和他的名字 专著 1953
哈金斯 著 增达的囚人 专著 1948]]> 2009-9-21 11:52:00(0) 素心人语 2009-9-17星期四(Thursday)晴 http://blog.tianya.cn/blogger/post_show.asp?BlogID=49294&PostID=19051345&idWriter=0&Key=0 年轻时生活是心境，心境如水，冷暖自己体味。
抛却丝竹入中年，生活蜕化为一种姿态，须由外界映像。]]> 2009-9-17 15:47:00(0) 打死wo也不说 2009-9-7星期一(Monday)晴 http://blog.tianya.cn/blogger/post_show.asp?BlogID=49294&PostID=18892662&idWriter=0&Key=0 作者：庄辉 提交日期：2009-9-1 19:19:00 访问：500 回复：20
　　
　　（本报告纯属虚构，请勿对号入座。）
　　　　
　　　　NO.1　前言：一份报告引发的“2009漩涡”
　　　　
　　　　2009年8月31日，晚，7：00。
　　　　中国非著名的电视媒体“CC踢V”在非主流的“旧闻联播”中，“非常不罕见”地报道了如下一则消息：
　　　　2008年12月21日夜，2009年1月1日晨；晨夜更新之时，新年旧年交替之际。
　　　　恰如一个陈旧的时代即将远去而尚未远去，一个崭新的时代即将到来而尚来到来。
　　　　一份神秘的报告开始出现在互联网上，在某些特殊的小圈子中不断更新、链接和复制，引发了一波又一波的“2009漩涡”。
　　　　报告名称很扯，很冷，很冻人――
　　　　《卧槽2009－2010：“中国国家毕业生”超级投资战略的预测与分析报告》（删节版，又简称《卧槽2009－2010：“中国国家毕业生”战略报告》）。
　　　　
　　　　该报告开篇直面这个时代最根本的问题：
　　　　2009年，找不到工作，找不到好工作！
　　　　到底是我们出了问题，还是整个国家出了问题？
　　　　到底是毕业生“很糟糕”，还是这个社会“很糟糕”？
　　　　报告称，2009年，660多万的应届毕业生在为整个国家的“毕业问题”埋单！
　　　　比如，为中国改革开放三十的教育改革问题埋单！
　　　　660多万的毕业生≤1个“中国国家毕业生”！
　　　　改革开放三十年，中国人“三十归零”；建国六十周年，中国直面“国家毕业”。
　　　　在全球“就业寒冬”和世界“失序危机”中，中国是在产业转移浪潮中“毕业即死亡”，还是成为大国崛起中的“超级毕业生”？
　　　　……
　　　　报告一出，业界轰传。
　　　　江湖传言，《卧槽2009－2010：“中国国家毕业生”战略报告》，是中国政治智库意见领袖、中国最著名的智囊刊物《中南海报告》主要起草者诸葛先生亲自列为NO.1的绝密文件，原拟为将于2009年7月3日至5日在北京举行的“从西方到新东方•全球智库峰会”的主题报告，高调唱响“接班人：中国未来政治家集团”的规模选拔培训计划，且作为揭开“2009金秋十月：建国六十周年阅兵庆典”的序幕，徐徐拉开……
　　　　江湖传言，《卧槽2009－2010》外泄之后，叱咤风云的“京城四大教父”紧急聚会。
　　　　在四巨头会上，国际赫赫有名的华尔街鬼才、ADG黄金中国投资基金大中国区合伙人兼总裁汤小宁坦承，报告外泄，纯属自己的总裁助理兼职场学徒黑马身陷“PE离职门”所致。
　　　　由此，江湖始知，报告的起草人为投资界非著名的“双子星座”之一、有“投资诗人哲学家”之称、自诩为“新庄子•野狐禅派”的黑马。
　　　　此前鲜为人知的黑马，因此报告暴得大名，故江湖简称此为《黑马报告》。
　　　　据知情人说，事发后，黑马已不知所踪，绝迹江湖。
　　　　仅残留《》的主题献辞――以及部分还在即时更新、难辨真伪的“报告删节文”：
　　　　卧槽――
　　　　明道，取势，乘时;
　　　　优术，熟技，深耕；
　　　　人、事、钱，“运气”--
　　　　深谙中国式智慧的永字八法，
　　　　只为活过今天，
　　　　徐图鲲鹏展翅，一伸鸿鹄之志：
　　　　多赚一点钱，活得更好一点，让身边人更幸福一点……
　　　　活着，就要好好地活下去；
　　　　而且，明天活得更美好。
　　　　
　　　　半年后，建国六十周年阅兵大典即将举行之际，当黑马重出江湖时，早已物是人非，文犹在，魂已不存……
　　

[$FIRST_BANNER_AD$]

]]> 2009-9-9 17:48:00(0)